Jump to content

Talk:Charleston riot of 1919

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Editorial response

[edit]

This is a good article, but I noticed that it didn't include any Charleston sources. While pulling some of those up, I saw the editorial from one of Charleston's big papers the next day. The editorial is, by any modern view, an insanely self-congratulatory excuse for the incidents. I think it is important to include to show what the City's position was. On the one hand, I don't want the quote to read like a current excuse for the incident, but I also don't want to intro it with any editorializing about its position. Any thoughts on how to handle it?--ProfReader (talk) 15:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]